From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CfjFS-00040J-WC
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 18 Dec 2004 13:24:11 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CfjFS-000400-8e
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 18 Dec 2004 13:24:10 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CfjFS-0003zq-6Q
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 18 Dec 2004 13:24:10 -0500
Received: from [212.16.62.51] (helo=mail.13thfloor.at)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cfj52-0000wY-2v
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 18 Dec 2004 13:13:24 -0500
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 19:13:23 +0100
From: Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] SMB for DOS ?
Message-ID: <20041218181323.GB8020@mail.13thfloor.at>
References: <41C20E6A.7010507@bellard.org> <41C210A3.30406@kadu.net>
	<41C215DA.4050805@bellard.org>
	<03BFD3A6-4FBC-11D9-8729-00039307264A@stanfordalumni.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <03BFD3A6-4FBC-11D9-8729-00039307264A@stanfordalumni.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Laurent Amon <amon@stanfordalumni.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 12:41:31AM +0100, Laurent Amon wrote:
>=20
> On 17 d=E9c. 04, at 00:10, Fabrice Bellard wrote:
>=20
> >Adrian Smarzewski wrote:
> >>I think QEMU should rather focus on x86-x86 speed now (to be full=20
> >>replacement of VMWare) and use as much external code for features as=20
> >>possible instead of implementing it.
> >x86 on x86 optimization is now the top item on my TODO list...
> >
> I hope you will not forget us poor mac users. Optimizing x86 on ppc=20
> performance would make a number of people very happy, I'd say.

performance on ppc can become very good because
there are much more registers available for emulating
the x86 stuff ...

best,
Herbert

> Pretty please?
>=20
> Lga.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> Qemu-devel mailing list
> Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel