From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1ChTNM-0003pr-W6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2004 08:51:33 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1ChTNM-0003pf-JH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2004 08:51:32 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1ChTNM-0003pc-FD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2004 08:51:32 -0500 Received: from [192.25.206.10] (helo=gluck.debian.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ChTCg-0000te-Pt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2004 08:40:30 -0500 Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 14:40:38 +0100 From: Guillem Jover Message-ID: <20041223134038.GD776@zulo.hadrons.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: Guillem Jover Subject: [Qemu-devel] ROM sources and checkout dates or versions Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi, We've a problem packaging current qemu sources for Debian, as they contain binaries without sources (namely the roms), thus forcing us to repackage the upstream tarball to remove them. Also due to that, we've started depending on an external package providing the Bochs bios binary, but then now we have some problems with the emulated network card. See for example: I'd like to know if it would be possible to include the sources for those roms, so we can easily reproduce the same binaries from source, and be able to use the pristine source tarball as well. Otherwise having the checkout dates or exact version used would be of help, although a bit cumbersome. thanks, guillem