From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Cu9Qb-0003i2-Hb
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 08:11:18 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Cu9QZ-0003gY-B2
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 08:11:15 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Cu9QY-0003fO-Qy
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 08:11:14 -0500
Received: from [195.135.220.2] (helo=Cantor.suse.de)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
	(Exim 4.34) id 1Cu9CJ-0005QA-Ec
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 07:56:31 -0500
Received: from hermes.suse.de (hermes-ext.suse.de [195.135.221.8])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CAF413B8E99
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 13:56:28 +0100 (CET)
From: Ulrich Hecht <uli@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Trouble compiling on SuSE 9.2
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 13:56:27 +0100
References: <200501270857.04924.martin@liga.dk>
In-Reply-To: <200501270857.04924.martin@liga.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200501271356.27405.uli@suse.de>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Hi!

On Thursday 27 January 2005 08:57, Martin Moeller wrote:
> I'm trying to compile the latest Qemu version on SUSE LINUX 9.2, but
> it barfs out with the following message at the end:
>
> ar rcs libqemu.a exec.o translate-all.o cpu-exec.o translate.o op.o
> helper.o helper2.o translate-copy.o disas.o  i386-dis.o
> gcc  -static -Wl,-T,/tmp/qemu/i386-vl.ld  -o qemu-fast vl.o osdep.o
[...]

> I have all the SDL devel and ALSA devel packages installed.
> libsdl.a has these unresolved symbols. libasound.a has symbols that
> almost match, save the @ALSA_0.9 part. Would recompiling SDL from
> source get rid of this non-existing dependency?

Yes, if you use SDL 1.2.8. SDL 1.2.7 as shipped with 9.2 was buggy in the 
sense that it used the old ALSA PCM API which cannot be linked 
statically because it uses versioned symbols. This is fixed in SDL 
1.2.8.

CU
Uli