From: Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at>
To: Fabrice Bellard <fabrice@bellard.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-fast target removal ?
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 21:46:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050130204619.GA14598@mail.13thfloor.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41FC04A8.5090308@bellard.org>
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 10:48:24PM +0100, Fabrice Bellard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I plan to remove the 'qemu-fast' target in the next release of QEMU. It
> is too painful to maintain, difficult to port and it needs a patched
> guest OS to work correctly.
hmm, but IMHO it's _a_lot_ faster than the qemu/soft mmu
and I'm using it on a regular basis for kernel development
(the patch is minimal and doesn't change anything relevant)
are you sure that you want to do that?
here is a comparison:
(2.6.11-rc2 kernel testboot, nothing else)
with qemu-fast (0.6.1):
3.31user 0.33system 0:08.39elapsed 43%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (5638major+1879minor)pagefaults 0swaps
with qemu (softmmu, 0.6.1)
19.25user 0.27system 0:23.25elapsed 83%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (901major+5788minor)pagefaults 0swaps
I would _really_ appreciate not to spend almost
three times the amount of time and a lot more
of cpu power to wait for the kernel to boot ...
> This target is replaced by the standard QEMU with soft mmu support. The
> QEMU Kernel Acceleration Layer which will be unveiled very soon will
> give much more performance while working with unpatched guest OSes.
any numbers for that? will it be compareable?
what will it require?
thanks for your work!
best,
Herbert
> Fabrice.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qemu-devel mailing list
> Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-30 21:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-29 21:48 [Qemu-devel] qemu-fast target removal ? Fabrice Bellard
2005-01-29 22:26 ` Magnus Damm
2005-01-29 22:39 ` Jim C. Brown
2005-01-30 4:44 ` Derek Fawcus
2005-01-30 20:46 ` Herbert Poetzl [this message]
2005-01-30 21:50 ` Fabrice Bellard
2005-01-31 15:26 ` zitu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050130204619.GA14598@mail.13thfloor.at \
--to=herbert@13thfloor.at \
--cc=fabrice@bellard.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).