From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CzZOC-0000dE-SM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 06:55:13 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CzZO8-0000bQ-9B for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 06:55:10 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CzZO6-0000YW-51 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 06:55:06 -0500 Received: from [62.4.22.179] (helo=mail.bbrox.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CzZ7V-0008G0-AI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 06:37:58 -0500 Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:37:53 +0100 From: Lionel Ulmer Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KQemu logic and marketing goals Message-ID: <20050211123753.A5056@bbland> References: <420BEEB7.1010906@bellard.org> <420C3F82.5020902@info9.net> <200502111054.31681.jm@poure.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200502111054.31681.jm@poure.com>; from jm@poure.com on Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 10:54:31AM +0100 Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: jm@poure.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 10:54:31AM +0100, Jean-Michel POURE wrote: > I agree with you. As far as I am concerned, I thought Qemu could be used to > ease the migration of MS Windows and other OSes to GNU/Linux. And what would the fact of the 'closeness' of the KQEMU module hurt this goal ? > I don't understand the logic behind KQemu. > Fabrice, can you tell us more about your marketing projects ? Well, maybe the simple logic of being able to pay one's bills with the work one produces ? And you will always have the fully LGPL'ed / BSD licensed 'normal' QEMU to use if, for political / practical /technical reasons, you do not wish to taint your kernel. Lionel -- Lionel Ulmer - http://www.bbrox.org/