From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D2x7t-0005SI-Kn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 14:52:23 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D2x7i-0005OU-C4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 14:52:13 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D2x7h-0005KF-Mz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 14:52:09 -0500 Received: from [65.74.133.9] (helo=mail.codesourcery.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1D2wc9-0005Ou-Hl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 14:19:33 -0500 From: Paul Brook Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 19:19:26 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502201919.27396.paul@codesourcery.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] Patch ping Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org I posted a patch implementing arm vfp emulation over a week ago, and it seems to have passed without comment: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2005-02/msg00131.html Paul