From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D7bVn-0001wd-3z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 10:48:15 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D7bVf-0001ro-2s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 10:48:07 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D7bVd-0001ox-W5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 10:48:06 -0500 Received: from [128.8.10.162] (helo=po0.wam.umd.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D7bCd-0007ZW-Bx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 10:28:27 -0500 Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 10:28:13 -0500 From: "Jim C. Brown" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Compiling in amd64 fails with sources from CVS Message-ID: <20050305152813.GA19386@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org> References: <1110021009.4555.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> <87is46cn6v.fsf@tazzelwurm.hczim.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: hcz@hczim.de, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 02:23:09PM +0100, Heike C. Zimmerer wrote: > > This ws not intended to go through the list. Anyboby knows why this > list sets a Reply-To pointing to the list, thus redirecting mail > replies to the list? This is rather uncommon among the lists I'm > subscribed to. > > Anyway, keep up the good work. > > - Heike > For me, about 50% of the lists set the Reply-To, and 50% don't. This is sort of annoying for me because I use an old version of mutt that lacks a 'Reply, ignore Reply-To" command, but that is simply a matter of patching. There are good reasons to go either way. (I would be happty to discuss the merits of this off of the list.) -- Infinite complexity begets infinite beauty. Infinite precision begets infinite perfection.