From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DHtX4-000759-4p
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 20:04:06 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DHtWt-0006zR-SJ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 20:03:59 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DHtWt-0006xx-FM
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 20:03:55 -0500
Received: from [128.8.10.163] (helo=po1.wam.umd.edu)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DHtLH-0002Db-Lq
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 19:51:55 -0500
Received: from jbrown.mylinuxbox.org (jma-box.student.umd.edu [129.2.237.180])
	by po1.wam.umd.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j330pbnd015459
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 19:51:37 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 19:47:07 -0500
From: "Jim C. Brown" <jma5@umd.edu>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Open source qemu x86 accelerator module.
Message-ID: <20050403004707.GA4027@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org>
References: <200504030022.17173.paul@codesourcery.com>
	<41e41e7a050402154521b4d775@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <41e41e7a050402154521b4d775@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 01:45:48AM +0200, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> 3. Do you plan to make it work with the 2.4.x kernels?

On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 19:32:46 -0500, I wrote:
> Also tested on 2.4 kernels with devfs (works fine).

Actually, no. I just checked out the CVS and the Makefile is missing the 2 lines
which are needed to get qvm86 to compile correctly on 2.4 (despite the fact that
I told pbrook about this twice).

I don't know why he hasn't applied this patch, perhaps he doesn't plan to make
this work with 2.4 after all. Or he just forgot.

--- Makefile.old        Sat Apr  2 19:41:33 2005
+++ Makefile    Sat Apr  2 19:42:43 2005
@@ -36,6 +36,9 @@
 
 include $(TOPDIR)/Rules.make
 
+qvm86.o: $(qvm86-objs)
+       $(LD) -r -o $@ $(qvm86-objs)
+
 else
 # called from 2.6 kernel kbuild
 
-- 
Infinite complexity begets infinite beauty.
Infinite precision begets infinite perfection.