From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DHt3r-0005Cu-GQ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 19:33:55 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DHt3m-00059q-Uo
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 19:33:51 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DHt3m-00058H-Pn
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 19:33:50 -0500
Received: from [65.74.133.9] (helo=mail.codesourcery.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1DHt1J-0000pI-K3
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 19:31:17 -0500
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Open source qemu x86 accelerator module.
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 01:30:59 +0100
References: <200504030022.17173.paul@codesourcery.com>
	<41e41e7a050402154521b4d775@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <41e41e7a050402154521b4d775@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200504030130.59456.paul@codesourcery.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Sunday 03 April 2005 00:45, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> First - congratulations for your new kernel module. I have few
> questions, if you don't mind:
>
> 1. Have you tested the speed compared to QEMU CVS + kqemu?

No. I expect that kqemu is faster at this stage.

> 2. Which Windows 2000 have you installed? there are few versions of
> the bootable CD's, few of them comes with service packs already
> applied..

My win2k CD is one of the original ones without any service packs. I haven't 
tried installing windows under qvm86, only booting existing images.

> 3. Do you plan to make it work with the 2.4.x kernels?

Probably. It's not a particularly high priority, but it shouldn't be that hard 
either. I don't currently have any machines with 2.4 kernels, so I'd have to 
install one first...

> 4. Have you tried installing it with XP as guest?

No. My XP CD doesn't work in normal qemu (installs OK but gets an activation 
error after rebooting), so I haven't tried it.

Paul