From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DHu2O-0004TQ-QG
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 20:36:29 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DHu2F-0004Ny-I2
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 20:36:23 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DHu2D-0004KY-60
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 20:36:17 -0500
Received: from [65.74.133.9] (helo=mail.codesourcery.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1DHtjC-0003k8-SN
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 20:16:39 -0500
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Open source qemu x86 accelerator module.
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 02:16:19 +0100
References: <200504030022.17173.paul@codesourcery.com>
	<41e41e7a050402154521b4d775@mail.gmail.com>
	<20050403004707.GA4027@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org>
In-Reply-To: <20050403004707.GA4027@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200504030216.19970.paul@codesourcery.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Sunday 03 April 2005 01:47, Jim C. Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 01:45:48AM +0200, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> > 3. Do you plan to make it work with the 2.4.x kernels?
>
> On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 19:32:46 -0500, I wrote:
> > Also tested on 2.4 kernels with devfs (works fine).
>
> Actually, no. I just checked out the CVS and the Makefile is missing the 2
> lines which are needed to get qvm86 to compile correctly on 2.4 (despite
> the fact that I told pbrook about this twice).
>
> I don't know why he hasn't applied this patch, perhaps he doesn't plan to
> make this work with 2.4 after all. Or he just forgot.

The latter. Fixed now.

Paul