From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DHx1U-0003W4-6c
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 23:47:44 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DHx1P-0003SB-4C
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 23:47:40 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DHx1O-0003KY-MN
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 23:47:38 -0500
Received: from [128.8.10.164] (helo=po2.wam.umd.edu)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DHwqs-00071A-2w
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 23:36:46 -0500
Received: from jbrown.mylinuxbox.org (jma-box.student.umd.edu [129.2.237.180])
	by po2.wam.umd.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j334aRUD006202
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 23:36:27 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 23:31:58 -0500
From: "Jim C. Brown" <jma5@umd.edu>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Open source qemu x86 accelerator module.
Message-ID: <20050403043158.GA26221@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org>
References: <200504030022.17173.paul@codesourcery.com>
	<41e41e7a050402154521b4d775@mail.gmail.com>
	<20050403004707.GA4027@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org>
	<200504030216.19970.paul@codesourcery.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200504030216.19970.paul@codesourcery.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 02:16:19AM +0100, Paul Brook wrote:
> > I don't know why he hasn't applied this patch, perhaps he doesn't plan to
> > make this work with 2.4 after all. Or he just forgot.
> 
> The latter. Fixed now.
> 
> Paul
> 

Thanks.

BTW, when I was compiling qvm86, I got an error in qvm86-linux.c about a
<linux/device.h> (which I don't have). Commenting out that line made the
kernel module compile correctly (under 2.4.26).

-- 
Infinite complexity begets infinite beauty.
Infinite precision begets infinite perfection.