From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DOdM8-0004Mw-Ff for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 11:12:40 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DOdM7-0004MC-NL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 11:12:40 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DOdM7-00027A-E2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 11:12:39 -0400 Received: from [65.74.133.9] (helo=mail.codesourcery.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1DOdNf-0003G1-Nr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 11:14:16 -0400 From: Paul Brook Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] X86_64 (AMD64) build segfaults Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 16:11:40 +0100 References: <20050421163413.37378212@smirftschs.home.tld> <200504211542.19046.paul@codesourcery.com> <20050421165923.0f4f1185@smirftschs.home.tld> In-Reply-To: <20050421165923.0f4f1185@smirftschs.home.tld> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504211611.40785.paul@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org [Sorry to reply twice, meant to add this onto my last mail] On Thursday 21 April 2005 15:59, developer@isl-gbr.de wrote: > Removing the optimizations (the -O2) it does compile, but qemu segfaults > when trying to start. This is normal. qemu is fairly fussy about what optimization options are used to compile op.c. > So what chances do i have ? Sending a report to gcc.gnu.org or what can i > do to trace this bug down ? I have nearly no idea about assembly, which > seems to be used in the part its segfaulting. See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html Paul