From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DQAoJ-0000wb-EL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 17:08:07 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DQAoH-0000wP-Om for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 17:08:07 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DQAoH-0000WG-Kt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 17:08:05 -0400 Received: from [62.4.22.179] (helo=mail.bbrox.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DQAmy-0003de-9c for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 17:06:44 -0400 Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 23:03:12 +0200 From: Lionel Ulmer Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] option -no-tsc for i386 with speedstep Message-ID: <20050425230312.A6186@bbland> References: <20050425111532.GA2554@dizzy.ath.cx> <426D3DBE.9080307@bellard.org> <20050425201706.GA11602@dizzy.ath.cx> <380218305509284f15ded3ac17915cb1@elis.ugent.be> <426D5552.4000104@reactos.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <426D5552.4000104@reactos.com>; from navaraf@reactos.com on Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 10:38:42PM +0200 Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 10:38:42PM +0200, Filip Navara wrote: > (Once again Windows NT were ahead of time with this idea implemented way > earlier ;-) Strange, I got report from people testing stuff in Wine (about the same RTDSC problem with laptops) finding out that 'gettimeofday' was taking less time than 'QueryPerformanceCounter' in Windows (ie more calls per seconds). Lionel -- Lionel Ulmer - http://www.bbrox.org/