From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DWaCq-0007Nd-9g
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 May 2005 09:27:57 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DWaCo-0007Md-1V
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 May 2005 09:27:54 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DWaCn-0007JY-GR
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 May 2005 09:27:53 -0400
Received: from [216.148.227.85] (helo=rwcrmhc12.comcast.net)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DWaGL-0000CJ-ST
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 May 2005 09:31:34 -0400
From: Jason Gress <jasong@ccgr.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] We want to example qemu and the accel-module in our
	distribution.
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 08:24:31 -0500
References: <afaa4a13050512201447e02b1f@mail.gmail.com>
	<41e41e7a050513013357254055@mail.gmail.com>
	<46d6db66050513054357c83f99@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <46d6db66050513054357c83f99@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200505130824.31239.jasong@ccgr.org>
Reply-To: jasong@ccgr.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Christian MICHON <christian.michon@gmail.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Friday 13 May 2005 07:43 am, Christian MICHON wrote:
> There are people out there already distributing kqemu, if I understand
> enough the following article.
>
> http://knoppix.guilinux.com/article.php?sid=1067
>
> Did they get approval? Or are they just re-packaging qemu and asking
> the end-user to recompile kqemu module themselves ?

This is interesting.  If this is true, perhaps Fabrice is receiving the just 
compensation for KQEMU that he deserves?  It would be wonderful if KQEMU 
became free software as his website suggests is possible with the proper 
support.  Or, perhaps the Red Flag folks can help in this regard?  I know 
that so many of us would love to see KQEMU become free software if Fabrice's 
conditions are met!  Comments?

	Jason