qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Blue Swirl <blueswir1@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: request : qemu-smp as target
Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 12:31:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200505141231.22402.paul@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BAY104-F21B3902A51A90415295094FF130@phx.gbl>

On Saturday 14 May 2005 10:37, Blue Swirl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The architecture used in sparc target (sun4m) supports SMP up to a maximum
> of 16 CPUs. At hardware emulation level (hw/*, target-sparc/*), it would be
> easy to add the missing interprocessor interrupts, per-CPU counters and
> atomic instructions. It would also be simple to add the prom functions for
> starting/stopping CPUs to Proll. Maybe some days' work in total.
>
> Higher level (vl.c, cpu-exec.c) could need more work. Maybe Fabrice can
> enlighten us?

I guess you'd really want to simulate multiple CPUs with multiple host 
threads. One of the additional problems could then be memory/cache coherency. 
I'm not sure how much of a problem this would be in practice. If both host 
and guest require the same (or no) explicit SMP memory barriert it's not a 
problem. It the guest has stronger coherency requirements than the host we 
have a problem.

> For some reason, Sparc performance is low (1/10 of native x86 nbench)
> compared to x86 (2/3). Simulating SMP on a uniprocessor would only decrease
> performance.

It think x86-on-x86 user-mode uses code-copying by default. ie. it runs a lot 
of the the code unmodified. In my experience i386-softmmu is generally 10-15x 
slower than native, and arm-user is 5-10x slower.

Paul

  reply	other threads:[~2005-05-14 11:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-14  9:37 [Qemu-devel] Re: request : qemu-smp as target Blue Swirl
2005-05-14 11:31 ` Paul Brook [this message]
2005-05-14 15:22   ` Blue Swirl
2005-05-14 12:16 ` Fabrice Bellard
2005-05-14 13:11   ` Jonas Maebe
2005-05-14 14:46   ` Blue Swirl
2005-05-14 16:55   ` Joe Batt
2005-05-17 20:21     ` Paul Brook
2005-05-17 20:41       ` Joe Batt
2005-05-17 20:59         ` Paul Brook
2005-05-18 11:29         ` Mark Williamson
2005-05-18 21:19           ` Re[2]: " Igor Shmukler
2005-05-18 11:25       ` Mark Williamson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-05-16 13:17 octane indice

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200505141231.22402.paul@codesourcery.com \
    --to=paul@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=blueswir1@hotmail.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).