From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Joe Batt <Joe@soliddesign.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: request : qemu-smp as target
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 21:21:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200505172121.28546.paul@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1116089712.18405.14.camel@fred.ofc.soliddesign.net>
> What inter processor synchronization issues are there? Could you take
> this a step further and use processes on different machines for each
> processor? (There are many shared memory implementations to choose
> from.) Are there so many resources shared
> between the CPUs to make this a ridiculous proposition?
Baically most SMP/shared memory systems assume very low latency communication
between CPUs and memory. For example on opteron systems remote memory latency
is of the order of 200 cpu cycles. Typical ethernet latency is several
million cycles.
To do single-system image over a high latency interconnect (eg. ethernet) you
need OS and preferably use application support to avoid high-contention
memory areas. Simulating a SMP system over multiple separate nodes is
theoretically possible, but performance would probaby be abysmal.
The only solution I can imagine being even vaguely worthwhile is a running
user-mode qemu on top of a native openmozix system.
> I have ignorantly implemented an SH2 emulator,
Cool. Any chance you're going to make these changes publicly available?
Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-17 22:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-14 9:37 [Qemu-devel] Re: request : qemu-smp as target Blue Swirl
2005-05-14 11:31 ` Paul Brook
2005-05-14 15:22 ` Blue Swirl
2005-05-14 12:16 ` Fabrice Bellard
2005-05-14 13:11 ` Jonas Maebe
2005-05-14 14:46 ` Blue Swirl
2005-05-14 16:55 ` Joe Batt
2005-05-17 20:21 ` Paul Brook [this message]
2005-05-17 20:41 ` Joe Batt
2005-05-17 20:59 ` Paul Brook
2005-05-18 11:29 ` Mark Williamson
2005-05-18 21:19 ` Re[2]: " Igor Shmukler
2005-05-18 11:25 ` Mark Williamson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-05-16 13:17 octane indice
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200505172121.28546.paul@codesourcery.com \
--to=paul@codesourcery.com \
--cc=Joe@soliddesign.net \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).