From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DYCgw-00043O-Rt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 May 2005 20:45:43 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DYCgv-00042Y-8S for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 May 2005 20:45:41 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DYCen-0002to-M7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 May 2005 20:43:29 -0400 Received: from [65.74.133.9] (helo=mail.codesourcery.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1DYCXV-0004zp-Br for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 May 2005 20:37:32 -0400 From: Paul Brook Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Mingw32 cross compile fixes from 64-bit host Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 01:27:10 +0100 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200505180127.11100.paul@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Tuesday 17 May 2005 10:01, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote: > I had the following in my tree for a while but forgot to submit it. This > fixes cross compilation to mingw32 from 64-bit host (x86_64). Actually, > this makes dyngen aware of correct COFF format. >... > + char It doesn't really make any difference, but wouldn't it be more consistent to use [u]int8_t instead of char? Paul