From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DbPGS-0008P4-4s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 May 2005 16:47:36 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DbPGR-0008OW-EC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 May 2005 16:47:35 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DbPGR-0008OT-BH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 May 2005 16:47:35 -0400 Received: from [128.8.10.164] (helo=po2.wam.umd.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DbP2v-0005UB-Sb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 May 2005 16:33:38 -0400 Received: from jbrown.mylinuxbox.org (jma-box.student.umd.edu [129.2.237.180]) by po2.wam.umd.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j4QKWqPC019095 for ; Thu, 26 May 2005 16:32:53 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 16:32:52 -0400 From: "Jim C. Brown" Subject: gtk [was Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Embed QEmu screen on a custom window] Message-ID: <20050526203252.GA5985@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org> References: <26b3ab7050526044214f0ff81@mail.gmail.com> <46d6db660505260510767c2cf7@mail.gmail.com> <42962B93.1040606@bellard.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42962B93.1040606@bellard.org> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 10:03:31PM +0200, Fabrice Bellard wrote: > >this would pay more than to have 1 frontend for windows, 1 for linux, > >1 for sparc, 1 for mac, etc... > > > >what's your opinion on this ? > > As I said earlier, I would prefer to integrate the GUI in QEMU like the > cocoa.m implementation. GTK for Linux is the best option. Out of curiosity, would you accept an intergrated GUI for Linux if it was based on Xlib or an updated QtC (which was a Qt wrapper that enabled Qt to be used in C programs) ? The main advantage, that I can see, with using GTK is that you can run it on the framebuffer (without X) - provided you have the proper GTK/GDK libs. > Fabrice. > -- Infinite complexity begets infinite beauty. Infinite precision begets infinite perfection.