From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ddt3V-00006y-1f
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2005 13:00:29 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ddt3S-00005f-I5
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2005 13:00:27 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ddt3S-0008W7-88
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2005 13:00:26 -0400
Received: from [65.74.133.9] (helo=mail.codesourcery.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1Ddt1Q-0007xu-99
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2005 12:58:20 -0400
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Debugging guest OS
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 17:55:57 +0100
References: <429EFEE0.4020003@agro.uba.ar>
	<200506021635.03227.paul@codesourcery.com>
	<429F3481.6090302@agro.uba.ar>
In-Reply-To: <429F3481.6090302@agro.uba.ar>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200506021755.57444.paul@codesourcery.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Thursday 02 June 2005 17:32, Mariano Wahlmann wrote:
> Paul Brook wrote:
> >On Thursday 02 June 2005 16:20, Mariano Wahlmann wrote:
> >>but in order to disassemble i have to do "display /i $cs * 16 + $eip",
> >>this is for real mode,  what is the syntaxis for protected mode?
> >>is there any varible that contains a pointer to current virtual address
> >>of the next instruction.
> >
> >Usually it will just be $eip
> >
> >Technically you need to add the current code segment offset, but most
> > (all?) x86 OS use a flat memory model, so this is zero.
> >
> >Paul
>
> i think this is not true, you can have so many desciptors on gdt table,
> not all start at has 0  as base address.
> The way that i find to do that, is to look in "info register" on qemu
> monitor, and look what is the current base for cs and add it to eip.
> This is a very uneasy way.

Right, that's why I said "usually" and "most".

Paul