qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jim C. Brown" <jma5@umd.edu>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] What happened to linuxppc-img from Freeoszoo
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 14:24:36 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050627182436.GB17928@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <003701c57b3b$73bb0350$334d21d1@organiza3bfb0e>

On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 12:12:43PM -0500, jeebs@yango.us wrote:
> Right... But most of the images on FreeOSZoo were done using the *old*
> version of qemu, where the geometry is different.
> 
> That means the geometry on the images may not be what newer versions of qemu
> expect.
> 
> I did know that a lot of the images on there are older ones that may
> have problems like reactos did, which is why I said that somebody needed to
> actually test each one, just to make sure they still work.
> That's why I was asking what the date of the image was.
> 

For the record, the OpenBSD and the NetBSD images (which I downloaded from the
OS Zoo back in July of '04) work perfectly fine.

> > For the record, images I've used since qemu 0.5.2 still work fine with
> > CVS.
> > (I only use raw images though.)
> 
> That's good for you.
> 
> But some don't.
> 
> The ReactOS image is a case I tested myself.  When I saw it reported on the
> qemu forum, it was small enough that I spent a few minutes downloading it to
> test it.
> 
> And newer versions of qemu most definetly would not handle it.  Older 
> versions (before the geometry change) could, though.
> 

The bochs image of ReactOS 0.2.2-FINAL (the one that you'd get from the
reactos web site) still boots fine. I haven't tried the one from freeoszoo tho.

-- 
Infinite complexity begets infinite beauty.
Infinite precision begets infinite perfection.

  reply	other threads:[~2005-06-27 18:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-27 14:46 [Qemu-devel] What happened to linuxppc-img from Freeoszoo Jim C. Brown
2005-06-27 17:12 ` jeebs
2005-06-27 18:24   ` Jim C. Brown [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-06-24 21:52 Tero Kaarlela
2005-06-24 19:21 ` jeebs

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050627182436.GB17928@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org \
    --to=jma5@umd.edu \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).