From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Dyx1x-0007UW-Iz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 15:29:59 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Dyx1t-0007SK-BG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 15:29:53 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dyx1t-0007PH-1W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 15:29:53 -0400 Received: from [65.74.133.11] (helo=mail.codesourcery.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1Dywxh-0001zN-RK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 15:25:34 -0400 From: Paul Brook Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Patch Submission] QEMU with GCC/Win32 Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 20:13:22 +0100 References: <42EBCA12.80603@steveperkins.net> In-Reply-To: <42EBCA12.80603@steveperkins.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507302013.22433.paul@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Saturday 30 July 2005 19:42, Steve D. Perkins wrote: > Hello all - > > I wrote to the list a few days ago to gauge interest in adding > support for GCC in the Win32 environment to the QEMU codebase. I > received no response to that inquiry, but decided to update my patch for > the 0.7.1 release anyway in hopes that it will be of use to people. The > patchfile text is included below... simply cut-and-paste it to a file > named "patchfile" in the location where you've decompressed the > qemu-0.7.1 tarball, and run the command "patch -p0 < patchfile". Are you sure you included the correct patch? I don't see anything win32 specific about this patch. AFAICS it's just the gcc4 patch *that I wrote* and posed some time ago. Both cygwin and mingw is still using gcc3.4.x, so it shouldn't be necessary. Paul