From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1E2uSA-0008G2-Jd
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:33:22 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1E2uS5-0008EF-MF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:33:18 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E2uS5-0008Dk-JW
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:33:17 -0400
Received: from [65.74.133.11] (helo=mail.codesourcery.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1E2uc6-0001cA-29
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:43:38 -0400
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] usb and qemu
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 18:28:55 +0100
References: <20050810105735.USAF20730.eastrmmtao04.cox.net@smtp.east.cox.net>
	<200508101503.26956.paul@codesourcery.com>
	<20050810170708.GA28309@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org>
In-Reply-To: <20050810170708.GA28309@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200508101828.55296.paul@codesourcery.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Wednesday 10 August 2005 18:07, Jim C. Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 03:03:25PM +0100, Paul Brook wrote:
> > > Isn't there a USB patch floating around somewhere (emulates OHCI in the
> > > guest)?
> >
> > Yes, but noone's written the code to wire it up to host devices. AFAIK it
> > currently emulates the host controller and not much else.
> >
> > Using the usb-over-ip protocol mentioned above seems like a nice way of
> > getting it to talk to host USB devices in a host-independent way.
>
> IIRC, one of the authors of the patch wanted to use usbip in qemu, so the
> guest could see and use host usb devices (thinking that they were connected
> to the virtual machine) without having to be aware of, or have support for,
> usbip.

Right, that's what I meant.

Paul