From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EFAWk-0003Ed-MI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:08:46 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EFAWZ-0003Az-Pz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:08:39 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EFAWZ-0003An-Ij for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:08:35 -0400 Received: from [128.8.10.163] (helo=po1.wam.umd.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EFAVj-0001P3-KQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:07:43 -0400 Received: from jbrown.mylinuxbox.org (jma-box.student.umd.edu [129.2.253.219]) by po1.wam.umd.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j8DD7gwf025414 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:07:42 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:07:33 -0400 From: "Jim C. Brown" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: QEMU 0.7.2 Message-ID: <20050913130733.GA27867@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org> References: <431B2E78.9020902@bellard.org> <20050908141852.GA26873@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org> <43261E56.3030406@us.ibm.com> <20050913025614.GB21668@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org> <43264B59.8090808@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43264B59.8090808@us.ibm.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 10:45:29PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Jim C. Brown wrote: > > If I understand this correctly, you have multiple processes displaying > to the same widget? > Currently, yes. The eventual goal is to manage multiple windows as well, so you can see more than one guest at a time. > Seems like it would be a lot easier if each process had it's own > Socket/Plug pair and then just make use of something like GtkNotebook. > Agreed. The reason I didn't try that was because I didn't know was GtkNotebook was. What would be really slick would be to be able to do what gaim does, drag and drop tabs across different windows or even drag a tab out of a window in order to create a new one. > >>There can then be separate GTK/QT guis without QEMU having to support > >>both widget sets. > >> > >> > > > >Or either (except some minimal GDK and the GtkPlug). There are definite > >advantages to going this route. > > > > > Yeah, I do like this approach quite a bit. My only concern would be the > performance of XShmImage vs whatever SDL is using. > I did not do any benchmarks but there does not seem to be any noticable speed differences. > Regards, > > Anthony Liguori > > > _______________________________________________ > Qemu-devel mailing list > Qemu-devel@nongnu.org > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel > -- Infinite complexity begets infinite beauty. Infinite precision begets infinite perfection.