From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EJWXe-0001eC-Gv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2005 09:27:42 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EJWXa-0001cj-S2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2005 09:27:40 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EJWTk-0007xR-9x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2005 09:23:40 -0400 Received: from [128.8.10.163] (helo=po1.wam.umd.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EJWQ3-0000HR-W8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2005 09:19:52 -0400 Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 09:19:48 -0400 From: "Jim C. Brown" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] getting past the ctrl-alt-del login in NT Message-ID: <20050925131948.GB3921@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org> References: <200509252158.30634.wes.parish@paradise.net.nz> <20050925102814.GA3703@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de> <4336935C.2010909@eridani.co.uk> <4e03026a05092505483350c2e0@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4e03026a05092505483350c2e0@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Guillaume POIRIER , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 02:48:51PM +0200, Guillaume POIRIER wrote: > Hi, > > > I have an NT4 installation under QEMU on my Linux box - and in grab > > mode, all I do is... press CTRL-ALT-DEL. Clicking in the window or > > hitting CTRL-ALT enters grab mode. > > FWIW: the CTRL-ALT-DEL sequence has been chosen so that it can't be > caught by a any program but windows (that to prevent trojan horses to > log your password instead of Windows's logging window). That means > that it's probably not possible to directly send the CTRL-ALT-DEL > sequence, but instead you need to map another series of keys that qemu > can send to the guest OS. > > Guillaume > That restriction doesn't seem to apply to Linux/X. But I agree, using sendkey is probably smarter. -- Infinite complexity begets infinite beauty. Infinite precision begets infinite perfection.