From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ELPzB-0001Sj-H0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 14:51:58 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ELPz0-0001Mi-Je for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 14:51:50 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ELPyy-0001Iy-TW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 14:51:45 -0400 Received: from [128.8.10.163] (helo=po1.wam.umd.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ELPoE-0003Wm-1D for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 14:40:38 -0400 Received: from jbrown.mylinuxbox.org (jma-box.student.umd.edu [129.2.253.219]) by po1.wam.umd.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j8UIeYmR011638 for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 14:40:35 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 14:40:31 -0400 From: "Jim C. Brown" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Current state of GCC 4 (non-)"support" on x86-64 ? Message-ID: <20050930184031.GA17699@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org> References: <433D60D0.8040601@bacbuc.dyndns.org> <200509301718.06167.paul@codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200509301718.06167.paul@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 05:18:02PM +0100, Paul Brook wrote: > On Friday 30 September 2005 16:59, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: > > Dear list, > > > > I understand that the current "official" qemu needs gcc 3.x and won't > > compile with gcc 4.x > > You can compile qemu and the kernel module with different compilers. > > Paul > To clarify: Just use gcc 4.x for kqemu, and load that into ur gcc 4.x kernel. Use gcc 3.x to build qemu itself (/usr/bin/qemu, /usr/bin/qemu-i386, etc). -- Infinite complexity begets infinite beauty. Infinite precision begets infinite perfection.