From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ESIbl-0008F9-Kv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 14:24:13 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ESIbj-0008Dy-UI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 14:24:13 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ESIbj-0008Do-Lt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 14:24:11 -0400 Received: from [193.252.22.31] (helo=smtp11.wanadoo.fr) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ESIbj-0000fG-J6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 14:24:11 -0400 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf1103.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id BBAB21C00041 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 20:24:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from stoned.pellereau.net (ANice-151-1-58-201.w83-197.abo.wanadoo.fr [83.197.94.201]) by mwinf1103.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 8FBAD1C000B9 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 20:24:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from kolibri (stoned.pellereau.net [192.168.0.1]) by stoned.pellereau.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2AB513D08 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 20:29:30 +0200 (CEST) From: Emmanuel Pellereau Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] kqemu processor feature question Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 20:23:47 +0200 References: <20051018184347.93934.qmail@web50514.mail.yahoo.com> <1129669383.5865.61.camel@aragorn> <43556663.9090203@wasp.net.au> In-Reply-To: <43556663.9090203@wasp.net.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200510192023.47943.qemu-devel@pellereau.net> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Le Mardi 18 Octobre 2005 23:17, Brad Campbell a =E9crit=A0: > John R. Hogerhuis wrote: > And it was all a bogus trail.. It's *timer* related! > I made start_rtc_timer() fail (return -1) unconditionally, and voila it > boots first time every time, and any Image I throw at it.. > So something in the win2k loader appears to be timing sensitive. I did try > the -win2k-hack for a lark, but that only had random results.. > So there is an issue with the RTC handler on this machine by the looks.. > RTC max freq is 1024, so it's not that.. further debugging required If I remember correctly, issues have been raised in qemu about speedstep=20 enabled processors. Could you could try to turn it off on your PIII-M ? Keep us informed. Regards Emmanuel P. > > Regards, > Brad