qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Qemu-devel] qemu Windows XP info in Docs
@ 2005-12-16  4:53 Mick Weiss
  2005-12-16 18:51 ` André Braga
  2005-12-17  0:53 ` Jim C. Brown
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mick Weiss @ 2005-12-16  4:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel

Hi everyone,

http://fabrice.bellard.free.fr/qemu/qemu-doc.html#SEC32 does not mention 
that it is possible to correct this by getting SP2. I have not varified 
this myself (I was told this on #qemu on freenode).

If this is indeed possible to run Windows XP on QEMU, then why isn't 
this in the docs?

Could someone varify if this does indeed correct the problem? Also, is 
there a bug # for this? BTW: I don't seem to find a BTS for QEMU.

Thanks!

- Mick

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu Windows XP info in Docs
  2005-12-16  4:53 [Qemu-devel] qemu Windows XP info in Docs Mick Weiss
@ 2005-12-16 18:51 ` André Braga
  2005-12-17  0:53 ` Jim C. Brown
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: André Braga @ 2005-12-16 18:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel

Well, I've been running XP for ages. The only problems I ever found,
and I could't even narrow it down to my specific setup yet for
absolute lack of time, was that changing display colour depths
garbages the screen (which is solved either by a VM reboot or a
resolution change as well and going back to the previous one) and that
if I'm running it under KQEMU with Windows XP host, if I attempt to
open the Date&Time applet, QEMU freezes, takes up 100% CPU and can't
be killed, forcing me to close every process I'm able to and then
press the reset switch =P

Then again, I'm using the company's VLK license and pressed SP2 disk,
so I might just be dodging the activation thing completely. :)



--
"The user-friendly computer is a red herring. The user-friendliness of
a book just makes it easier to turn pages. There's nothing
user-friendly about learning to read."
-Alan Kay


On 12/16/05, Mick Weiss <micklweiss@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> http://fabrice.bellard.free.fr/qemu/qemu-doc.html#SEC32 does not mention
> that it is possible to correct this by getting SP2. I have not varified
> this myself (I was told this on #qemu on freenode).
>
> If this is indeed possible to run Windows XP on QEMU, then why isn't
> this in the docs?
>
> Could someone varify if this does indeed correct the problem? Also, is
> there a bug # for this? BTW: I don't seem to find a BTS for QEMU.
>
> Thanks!
>
> - Mick

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu Windows XP info in Docs
  2005-12-16  4:53 [Qemu-devel] qemu Windows XP info in Docs Mick Weiss
  2005-12-16 18:51 ` André Braga
@ 2005-12-17  0:53 ` Jim C. Brown
  2005-12-17  3:27   ` Mick Weiss
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jim C. Brown @ 2005-12-17  0:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mick Weiss; +Cc: qemu-devel

On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 11:53:20PM -0500, Mick Weiss wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> http://fabrice.bellard.free.fr/qemu/qemu-doc.html#SEC32 does not mention 
> that it is possible to correct this by getting SP2. I have not varified 
> this myself (I was told this on #qemu on freenode).
> 
> If this is indeed possible to run Windows XP on QEMU, then why isn't 
> this in the docs?
> 

It is in the #qemu Wiki.

Why it is not in the official docs, I don't know. Probably no one has bothered
to tell Fabrice.

> Could someone varify if this does indeed correct the problem?

Yes.

> Also, is
> there a bug # for this?

Huh? We have a bugzilla system now??

When did this happen?

> 
> Thanks!
> 
> - Mick
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Qemu-devel mailing list
> Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
> 

-- 
Infinite complexity begets infinite beauty.
Infinite precision begets infinite perfection.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu Windows XP info in Docs
  2005-12-17  0:53 ` Jim C. Brown
@ 2005-12-17  3:27   ` Mick Weiss
  2005-12-17 21:21     ` André Braga
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mick Weiss @ 2005-12-17  3:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel

I think something may have gotten trunkated from my post. I asked if 
qemu has a BTS, I guess not.
Might be a good chance to ask why?

- Mick

>
>  
>
>>Also, is
>>there a bug # for this?
>>    
>>
>
>Huh? We have a bugzilla system now??
>
>When did this happen?
>
>  
>
>>Thanks!
>>
>>- Mick
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Qemu-devel mailing list
>>Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
>>http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
>>
>>    
>>
>
>  
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu Windows XP info in Docs
  2005-12-17  3:27   ` Mick Weiss
@ 2005-12-17 21:21     ` André Braga
  2005-12-18  3:00       ` Mick Weiss
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: André Braga @ 2005-12-17 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel

On 12/17/05, Mick Weiss <micklweiss@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> I think something may have gotten trunkated from my post. I asked if
> qemu has a BTS, I guess not.
> Might be a good chance to ask why?

AFAICT, nope. I guess most bugs are filled in the mailing list.
Actually, I seldom see bugs being fixed if not by someone commiting a
patch to do so.



--
"The user-friendly computer is a red herring. The user-friendliness of
a book just makes it easier to turn pages. There's nothing
user-friendly about learning to read."
-Alan Kay

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu Windows XP info in Docs
  2005-12-17 21:21     ` André Braga
@ 2005-12-18  3:00       ` Mick Weiss
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mick Weiss @ 2005-12-18  3:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel

André Braga wrote:

>On 12/17/05, Mick Weiss <micklweiss@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>  
>
>>I think something may have gotten trunkated from my post. I asked if
>>qemu has a BTS, I guess not.
>>Might be a good chance to ask why?
>>    
>>
>
>AFAICT, nope. I guess most bugs are filled in the mailing list.
>Actually, I seldom see bugs being fixed if not by someone commiting a
>patch to do so.
>  
>
Perhaps this is because people don't know there are bugs (since there is 
no bugzilla setup). I think there should be a bugzilla/lxr setup. Who is 
responsible for the website? I'd like to help the website maintainer set 
this up and (manage it if need be).

Regards,

- Mick

>
>
>--
>"The user-friendly computer is a red herring. The user-friendliness of
>a book just makes it easier to turn pages. There's nothing
>user-friendly about learning to read."
>-Alan Kay
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Qemu-devel mailing list
>Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
>http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
>
>
>  
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-12-18  3:01 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-12-16  4:53 [Qemu-devel] qemu Windows XP info in Docs Mick Weiss
2005-12-16 18:51 ` André Braga
2005-12-17  0:53 ` Jim C. Brown
2005-12-17  3:27   ` Mick Weiss
2005-12-17 21:21     ` André Braga
2005-12-18  3:00       ` Mick Weiss

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).