From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Eo2uQ-0000j4-8V
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 13:05:22 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Eo2uD-0000ek-0p
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 13:05:21 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Eo2uC-0000ed-Qq
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 13:05:08 -0500
Received: from [199.45.160.85] (helo=harmony.bsdimp.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1Eo2wz-0003BK-RN
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 13:08:02 -0500
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:42:16 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <20051218.104216.28085930.imp@bsdimp.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] ARM ethernet fixes
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20051218172558.GA446@nevyn.them.org>
References: <200512150000.07159.paul@codesourcery.com>
	<200512181651.02705.paul@codesourcery.com>
	<20051218172558.GA446@nevyn.them.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, drow@false.org
Cc: paul@codesourcery.com

In message: <20051218172558.GA446@nevyn.them.org>
            Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> writes:
: On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 04:51:02PM +0000, Paul Brook wrote:
: > Something like the attached patch.
: 
: After getting myself, and probably Paul, completely confused about
: array indexing, I agree that this version is right :-)  It also boots
: and appears to work.  Network performance is not very good (averaging
: about 10K/s - 30K/s most of the time, but occasionally spiking higher),
: but there may be something we can do about that later.  Thanks.

Given all these improvements in arm support, what's the status of
system level support for arm, and what system is emulated?  You don't
need device emulation to do userland stuf...

Warner