From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Eo2JD-0003bz-UL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 12:26:56 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Eo2JC-0003YF-9x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 12:26:55 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Eo2JC-0003Y6-5X for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 12:26:54 -0500 Received: from [66.93.172.17] (helo=nevyn.them.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1Eo2M0-0004KV-2A for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 12:29:48 -0500 Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 12:25:58 -0500 From: Daniel Jacobowitz Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] ARM ethernet fixes Message-ID: <20051218172558.GA446@nevyn.them.org> References: <20051214221705.GA21427@nevyn.them.org> <200512150000.07159.paul@codesourcery.com> <200512181651.02705.paul@codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200512181651.02705.paul@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paul Brook Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 04:51:02PM +0000, Paul Brook wrote: > Something like the attached patch. After getting myself, and probably Paul, completely confused about array indexing, I agree that this version is right :-) It also boots and appears to work. Network performance is not very good (averaging about 10K/s - 30K/s most of the time, but occasionally spiking higher), but there may be something we can do about that later. Thanks. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC