From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F19kk-00037x-Sa for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 17:01:34 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F19kf-000368-E2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 17:01:33 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F19ke-00035x-Vg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 17:01:29 -0500 Received: from [65.74.133.5] (helo=mail.codesourcery.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1F19pR-00024r-VZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 17:06:26 -0500 From: Paul Brook Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Vdeqemu question? Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 21:58:08 +0000 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200601232158.08776.paul@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Monday 23 January 2006 20:17, Ishwar Rattan wrote: > I have Linux (Debian absed) system with > qemu-0.8.0 and vde-2.0.1 installed and running. > > It comes out that vdeqemu does not pass the macaddress > info correctly to qemu: > > vdeqemu -hda ./image1 -m 128 & > > and > > vdeqemu -hda ./image2 -m 128 -net nic,macaddr=54:42:00:12:34:57 & > > end up having the same macaddress. > > Any one using this type of setups? Add -net vde and it should work. Paul