From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FID5N-00081S-2P
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2006 18:01:21 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FID5L-000811-7Q
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2006 18:01:20 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FID5L-00080y-3i
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2006 18:01:19 -0500
Received: from [128.8.10.163] (helo=po1.wam.umd.edu)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FID8x-0008Lg-2M
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2006 18:05:03 -0500
Received: from jbrown.mylinuxbox.org (jma-box.student.umd.edu [129.2.253.219])
	by po1.wam.umd.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k2BN1Jok002171
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sat, 11 Mar 2006 18:01:19 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 18:01:15 -0500
From: "Jim C. Brown" <jma5@umd.edu>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu (cvs-version) performance?
Message-ID: <20060311230115.GA30203@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org>
References: <dutgfr$8jm$1@sea.gmane.org>
	<200603112225.16535.paul@codesourcery.com>
	<duvjc7$d7$1@sea.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <duvjc7$d7$1@sea.gmane.org>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 11:35:48PM +0100, Sven K?hler wrote:
> I have seen thoughts about asynchronous IO for qemu. I thought that they
> would have been integrated along with the DMA-patches already.
> 
> I would really see how qemu performs with asynch IO enabled. Are there
> any patches out there?
> 

There was one that used threads to do IO asychonrously, but iiuc the final
patches (which will use posix? async io) are still being worked on..

You can find the patches in the mailing list archives.

> 
> Greetings
>   Sven
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Qemu-devel mailing list
> Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
> 

-- 
Infinite complexity begets infinite beauty.
Infinite precision begets infinite perfection.