From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FJrxF-0004Qm-4f
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 07:51:49 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FJrxC-0004Ni-M3
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 07:51:48 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FJrxC-0004NX-GF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 07:51:46 -0500
Received: from [128.8.10.163] (helo=po1.wam.umd.edu)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FJs1l-0004OU-JX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 07:56:29 -0500
Received: from jbrown.mylinuxbox.org (jma-box.student.umd.edu [129.2.253.219])
	by po1.wam.umd.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k2GCpX2Y027445
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 07:51:33 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 07:51:30 -0500
From: "Jim C. Brown" <jma5@umd.edu>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] better workaround for Error code: 0x800703e6
Message-ID: <20060316125130.GA20008@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0603161001570.8675@wicht.informatik.tu-chemnitz.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0603161001570.8675@wicht.informatik.tu-chemnitz.de>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 10:03:25AM +0100, Joerg Anders wrote:
> I think a found a workaround for the windows XP problem:
> 

That information was already in the Wiki FAQ.

Perhaps we should add a link to it from the main FAQ?

-- 
Infinite complexity begets infinite beauty.
Infinite precision begets infinite perfection.