From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FMp9X-0008NX-1C for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 11:28:43 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FMp9V-0008NL-5V for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 11:28:42 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FMp9V-0008NI-0L for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 11:28:41 -0500 Received: from [65.74.133.6] (helo=mail.codesourcery.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1FMpAL-00060s-QH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 11:29:34 -0500 From: Paul Brook Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Debugging low level ARM with GDB Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 16:28:32 +0000 References: <4422C85F.8040106@gmail.com> <200603231626.24838.paul@codesourcery.com> <44241462.2020202@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <44241462.2020202@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200603241628.34205.paul@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Dirk Behme Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org > But PC is still wrong. Who sets the PC to KERNEL_LOAD_ADDR > (0x10000)? What makes you think ti's wrong? There's a small bootloader built into qemu. > Then I tried the other way around: Instead of adapting > u-boot, it should be possible to adapt hw/integratorcp.c to > the address u-boot is linked to by default. This is > 0x11080000. For my changes see below. With this, I get You're obviously using the wrong u-boot config then. 0x11080000 isn't even a RAM address. Paul