From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FOhot-0007am-RD
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 16:03:11 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FOhor-0007Wv-3g
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 16:03:10 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FOhoq-0007Wj-VX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 16:03:09 -0500
Received: from [128.8.10.163] (helo=po1.wam.umd.edu)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FOhqs-0003mu-E5
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 16:05:14 -0500
Received: from jbrown.mylinuxbox.org (jma-box.student.umd.edu [129.2.253.219])
	by po1.wam.umd.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
	k2TL358B000573
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 16:03:06 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 16:03:04 -0500
From: "Jim C. Brown" <jma5@umd.edu>
Subject: [Off Topic] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Add gcc 4.0 support
Message-ID: <20060329210304.GA7737@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org>
References: <20060215122501.GA29709@networkno.de>
	<20060328140937.GB31939@networkno.de>
	<F4CBCED7-5B22-4C5F-AC94-7FBCAACC1220@mac.com>
	<20060329095947.GE31939@networkno.de>
	<E5E88543-C778-4819-B014-7E5D78127AED@mac.com>
	<e8ca35370603291124v325d81e1y7860e4d918524f82@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <e8ca35370603291124v325d81e1y7860e4d918524f82@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 09:24:59PM +0200, Pascal Terjan wrote:
> On 3/29/06, John Davidorff Pell <jpell.lists@mac.com> wrote:
> > P.S. Why does the list set the reply-to header, isn't that supposed
> > to be a Bad Thing??
> 
> Only according to some people :)
> I hate when I reply to a list and the message goes to the guy and not
> to the list... (If someone enforces Reply-To in his mail I think
> however that it should remain).
> 

Thats the fault of a badly configured mail client.

I personally dislike Reply-To mailing lists, but I fixed my mail client (mutt)
so it doesn't matter as much.

The reason I dislike Reply-To mailing lists - it is generally better to
accidently send a list mail to one person than to send a one-person mail to the 
list. (But again I fixed my client so this doesn't affect me so much.)

-- 
Infinite complexity begets infinite beauty.
Infinite precision begets infinite perfection.