From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FPw5a-00044p-N7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 02 Apr 2006 01:29:30 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FPw5X-00044d-JN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 02 Apr 2006 01:29:29 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FPw5X-00044a-EP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 02 Apr 2006 01:29:27 -0500 Received: from [212.16.62.50] (helo=mail.13thfloor.at) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1FPw8J-0004BI-QC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 02 Apr 2006 01:32:19 -0500 Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 08:01:32 +0200 From: Herbert Poetzl Message-ID: <20060402060132.GA30426@MAIL.13thfloor.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Subject: [Qemu-devel] x86_64 kernel with 32bit userspace Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hey Folks! this might sched some light on the x86_64 issues reported over and over again ... (maybe it's already fixed but I haven't tried yet) [ 78.890508] mount[39]: segfault at 00000000ffffcffc rip 00000000f7f8d210 rsp ffff8100ffffd000 error 6 [ 224.745093] sh[24]: segfault at 00000000fffeb9a0 rip 000000000809a27e rsp ffff8100fffeb994 error 6 [ 246.072068] sh[55]: segfault at 00000000fffeb1d0 rip 000000000809a27e rsp ffff8100fffeb1c4 error 6 [ 264.091665] echo[70]: segfault at 00000000ffffcffc rip 00000000f7f66210 rsp ffff8100ffffd000 error 6 best, Herbert