From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FSJ6m-00015Q-HA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2006 15:28:32 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FSJ6k-00015D-Pu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2006 15:28:31 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FSJ6k-00015A-Iv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2006 15:28:30 -0400 Received: from [128.8.10.163] (helo=po1.wam.umd.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FSJB0-0007rt-7W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2006 15:32:54 -0400 Received: from jbrown.mylinuxbox.org (jma-box.student.umd.edu [129.2.253.219]) by po1.wam.umd.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k38JST7s014837 for ; Sat, 8 Apr 2006 15:28:29 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2006 15:28:27 -0400 From: "Jim C. Brown" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Unified device model Message-ID: <20060408192827.GA17347@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org> References: <20060408191219.GB16963@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 09:17:52PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > IIRC bochs does it in C++. Which makes it rather impossible to share code > :-( > > Ciao, > Dscho > This is why I guessed qemu was a rewrite-from-scratch - C++ code is forbidden in qemu. Fortunately this does not prevent a properly designed binary plugin API. -- Infinite complexity begets infinite beauty. Infinite precision begets infinite perfection.