From: Bakul Shah <bakul+qemu@bitblocks.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: Enough already! [Qemu-devel] why is kqemu closed?
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 10:10:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060411171036.8F12D294B3@mail.bitblocks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 11 Apr 2006 12:09:15 EDT." <20060411160915.GB15858@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org>
My personal opinion:
Discussions of the GPL are like the bird 'flu -- any time
anyone offers any program for free and there is a
list/newsgroup about it, we know some "bird" will get the GPL
discussion 'flu. This is inevitable but we can't seem to
avoid it. And everyone who gets it, starts throwing up.
You will waste everyone's time going over the same old tired
arguments gone over literally hundreds of time in other
forums. In the end nothing gets resolved.
So enough already!
Instead can someone please figure out why plan9 doesn't work
with kqemu? Or how about profiling qemu and working on one
of the top 10 time hogs. Or work on qvm86. Or work on
adding new capabilities to qemu. Any of these is likely to
be more challenging, satisfying and fun than being down with
the GPL discussion 'flu blues. Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-11 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-10 15:16 [Qemu-devel] why is kqemu closed? Rakotomandimby Mihamina
2006-04-10 15:20 ` Hetz Ben Hamo
2006-04-10 15:47 ` Auke Kok
2006-04-10 15:55 ` Hetz Ben Hamo
2006-04-10 15:56 ` Leonardo E. Reiter
2006-04-11 4:37 ` Auke Kok
2006-04-11 7:58 ` Brad Campbell
2006-04-11 16:22 ` Jim C. Brown
2006-04-11 8:37 ` Ricardo Almeida
2006-04-11 9:46 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-04-11 10:05 ` Jamie Lokier
2006-04-11 15:05 ` Leonardo E. Reiter
2006-04-11 15:14 ` Jonas Maebe
2006-04-11 15:25 ` Jim C. Brown
2006-04-11 16:04 ` Jonas Maebe
2006-04-11 15:36 ` Paul Brook
2006-04-11 15:43 ` M. Warner Losh
2006-04-11 16:00 ` Paul Brook
2006-04-11 16:29 ` M. Warner Losh
2006-04-11 16:09 ` Jim C. Brown
2006-04-11 17:10 ` Bakul Shah [this message]
2006-04-11 15:17 ` Sebastian Kaliszewski
2006-04-11 15:31 ` M. Warner Losh
2006-04-11 12:33 ` andrzej zaborowski
2006-04-11 13:58 ` Jamie Lokier
2006-04-11 15:10 ` Sebastian Kaliszewski
2006-04-11 15:19 ` M. Warner Losh
2006-04-10 15:57 ` Brett (Mare) Henley
2006-04-10 16:02 ` Leonardo E. Reiter
2006-04-10 19:11 ` M. Warner Losh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060411171036.8F12D294B3@mail.bitblocks.com \
--to=bakul+qemu@bitblocks.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).