From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FTMO4-0004cm-AG
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 13:10:44 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FTMO1-0004bn-DR
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 13:10:43 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FTMO1-0004bd-8S
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 13:10:41 -0400
Received: from [209.204.185.216] (helo=mail.bitblocks.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FTMSu-0004dz-Dn
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 13:15:45 -0400
Received: from bitblocks.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.bitblocks.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F12D294B3
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 10:10:36 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Enough already! [Qemu-devel] why is kqemu closed? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 11 Apr 2006 12:09:15 EDT."
	<20060411160915.GB15858@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org>
From: Bakul Shah <bakul+qemu@bitblocks.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 10:10:36 -0700
Sender: bakul@bitblocks.com
Message-Id: <20060411171036.8F12D294B3@mail.bitblocks.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

My personal opinion:

Discussions of the GPL are like the bird 'flu -- any time
anyone offers any program for free and there is a
list/newsgroup about it, we know some "bird" will get the GPL
discussion 'flu.  This is inevitable but we can't seem to
avoid it.  And everyone who gets it, starts throwing up.

You will waste everyone's time going over the same old tired
arguments gone over literally hundreds of time in other
forums.  In the end nothing gets resolved.

So enough already!

Instead can someone please figure out why plan9 doesn't work
with kqemu?  Or how about profiling qemu and working on one
of the top 10 time hogs.  Or work on qvm86.  Or work on
adding new capabilities to qemu.  Any of these is likely to
be more challenging, satisfying and fun than being down with
the GPL discussion 'flu blues.  Thanks!