From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FWwGf-0008Ld-GJ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:05:53 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FWwGd-0008LI-Re
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:05:53 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FWwGd-0008LF-Og
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:05:51 -0400
Received: from [217.146.176.77] (helo=web26801.mail.ukl.yahoo.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FWwIC-0001iJ-PL
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:07:29 -0400
Message-ID: <20060421140545.4128.qmail@web26801.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 16:05:45 +0200 (CEST)
From: Sylvain Petreolle <spetreolle@yahoo.fr>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] New usb tablet and numlock
In-Reply-To: <44484273.3080007@us.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Reply-To: spetreolle@users.sourceforge.net, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

There's another point here.
When switching from the qemu monitor to the virtual machine window,
we enter ctrl-alt-1 and it seems these keys are passed too.

--- Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com> a écrit :

> This is probably because numlock is not sent to the guest unless you are 
> in grab mode.  You can still get into that mode by using ctrl-alt.
> 
> There's an interesting usability question here.  What keys should be 
> passed to the guest?  Should alt-tab be passed?  Should 
> num-lock/caps-lock be passed?  It would be pretty easy to hack up a 
> patch that grabbed the keyboard on mouse in and released it on mouse out 
> in grabless mode.  The only question in my mind is would this be 
> acceptable from the users perspective?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Anthony Liguori


Kind regards,
Sylvain Petreolle (aka Usurp)
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Listen to free Music: http://www.jamendo.com
Windows is proprietary, use free ReactOS instead : http://www.reactos.org