From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fhp95-0003ms-KF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 21 May 2006 10:43:03 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fhp93-0003jL-JS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 21 May 2006 10:43:02 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fhp93-0003j4-EH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 21 May 2006 10:43:01 -0400 Received: from [66.93.172.17] (helo=nevyn.them.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1FhpCp-0008GZ-VX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 21 May 2006 10:46:56 -0400 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1Fhp92-0005OQ-3F for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 21 May 2006 10:43:00 -0400 Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 10:43:00 -0400 From: Daniel Jacobowitz Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] single step with no IRQs and timers Message-ID: <20060521144300.GA20627@nevyn.them.org> References: <446F8396.2000607@windriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <446F8396.2000607@windriver.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 04:01:10PM -0500, Jason Wessel wrote: > + case 'q': > + /* parse any 'q' packets here */ > + if (!strcmp(p,"sstepbits")) { Hi Jason, Not that I'm always good about this myself, but could I ask you to follow this paragraph from the GDB manual, since these are commands unlikely to be supported by a general GDB (at least not unless someone proposes them...): * The names of custom vendor packets should use a company prefix, in lower case, followed by a period. For example, packets designed at the Acme Corporation might begin with `qacme.foo' (for querying foos) or `Qacme.bar' (for setting bars). Company name could be whatever here - either wrs or qemu, I suppose, probably qemu. By that logic it would probably be Qqemu.sstep=5, too, though that's less important. The goal is of course not to conflict with later versions of GDB. And thanks for doing this! What a great idea! -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery