From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FjepO-0003kJ-M1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 May 2006 12:06:18 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FjepM-0003jW-TI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 May 2006 12:06:18 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FjepM-0003jS-OH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 May 2006 12:06:16 -0400 Received: from [62.241.163.7] (helo=blaster.systems.pipex.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FjeuH-0008H1-Rk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 May 2006 12:11:22 -0400 From: Paul Brook Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu ./Makefile.target ./usb-linux.c ./vl.c ./v... Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 17:06:13 +0100 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605261706.13954.paul@nowt.org> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Friday 26 May 2006 16:55, Blue Swirl wrote: > >Could you elaborate a bit more please? I've no idea what you mean by > >"partial > >transfers". > > Actually the problem was that Qemu block devices use fixed sector size 512, > not variable 2048/512 like scsi layer. This meant that the bdrv_read > transferred too little data. Fix attached. Ah, I see. I'm fairly sure your patch is not sufficient though. I'll look into it. Paul