From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FjjUr-00037o-DV
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 May 2006 17:05:25 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FjjUq-00037U-If
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 May 2006 17:05:25 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FjjUq-00037R-E4
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 May 2006 17:05:24 -0400
Received: from [65.74.133.6] (helo=mail.codesourcery.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1FjjZo-0008WB-AT
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 May 2006 17:10:32 -0400
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu and -net tap networking
Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 22:05:19 +0100
References: <e57pte$coi$1@sea.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <e57pte$coi$1@sea.gmane.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200605262205.19752.paul@codesourcery.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Ritesh Raj Sarraf <rrs@researchut.com>

<snip>
> The problem is that when both are running, the one that boots second cannot
> ping its gateway. If I halt the first qemu process and restart the second
> qemu process, it works fine.
>
> Is this a known behavior ?
>
> I thought separating them with separate virtual networks would allow me to
> run multiple qemu instances with full networking support.

The two instances are independent. The bug is almost certainly in your host 
configuration somewhere.

Paul