From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FtBhl-00017o-9D
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 19:01:49 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FtBhj-00016S-G6
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 19:01:48 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FtBhj-00016L-Da
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 19:01:47 -0400
Received: from [81.103.221.49] (helo=mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FtBsZ-0003ER-H9
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 19:12:59 -0400
From: Julian Seward <jseward@acm.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] cvttps2dq, movdq2q, movq2dq incorrect behaviour
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 00:01:36 +0100
References: <200606201154.40985.jseward@acm.org>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0606211214070.698@home.oyster.ru>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0606211502190.2135@home.oyster.ru>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0606211502190.2135@home.oyster.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200606220001.37368.jseward@acm.org>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org


> It appears that cvttps2dq is indeed the only exception in the range,
> combined patch that fixes both movd?q2d?q and cvttps2dq is attached.
>
> I don't have any kind of SSE on this machine so would apprecaite if
> someone would run tests/test-i386 with the patch attached.

That works for me.  Thanks.  Valgrind's integer/x87/MMX/SSE/SSE2 tests 
now all pass on i386-softmmu.  I didn't try tests/test-i386 though.

Fabrice, can you commit this?

J