From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Fz6Q4-0002T1-TX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 02:36:00 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Fz6Q2-0002Sp-Et
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 02:35:59 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fz6Q2-0002Sm-9Y
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 02:35:58 -0400
Received: from [199.45.160.85] (helo=harmony.bsdimp.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1Fz6Qc-000595-2M
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 02:36:34 -0400
Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2006 00:34:44 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <20060708.003444.-399284312.imp@bsdimp.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU GUI
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0607080435400.29667@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
References: <44AC2667.8030008@gentoo.org>
	<Pine.LNX.4.62.0607080309090.18881@top.qwarx.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.63.0607080435400.29667@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de

In message: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0607080435400.29667@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
            Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
: > I personally don't like tcl as a language, and prefer to code in C++ for 
: > efficiency.
: 
: Hmmm. "C++" and "efficiency" _does_ constitute a contradiction. Just think 
: "operator+()". Honestly, the most inefficient code I saw was done in C++. 
: You really should get a weapon's license before coding in C++.

You can hunt game or foot with C++.  Only one will feed your family :-)

Warner