From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G0HXU-0003ut-R2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2006 08:40:32 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G0HXS-0003t2-UG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2006 08:40:32 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G0HXS-0003ss-P8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2006 08:40:30 -0400 Received: from [204.127.200.82] (helo=sccrmhc12.comcast.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G0HYm-0004mD-63 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2006 08:41:52 -0400 From: Jason Gress Subject: Re: wxWidgets and C: was Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU GUI Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 07:40:21 -0500 References: <44AC2667.8030008@gentoo.org> <44B356D7.9040704@sjsoft.com> In-Reply-To: <44B356D7.9040704@sjsoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200607110740.25142.jasong@ccgr.org> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org I know this is a lot different than the discussion so far, but has anyone considered keeping SDL and using an SDL GUI similar to ZSNES? Take a look (for those not familiar) at http://www.zsnes.com and grab a download. Many Linux distro package managers have it also. You don't need a SNES ROM to look at the GUI. It looks like it would be hard to borrow even though it's GPL (parts are in ASM...) but I thought I'd bounce the idea off of the list. Jason On Tuesday 11 July 2006 02:44, David Fraser wrote: > John R. wrote: > > On 7/8/06, Oliver Gerlich wrote: > >> Is wxC still under active development? The CVS version seems to be quite > >> old, and I also couldn't find any documentation. > > > > Well it wouldn't be the first unmaintained batch of code added to > > QEMU... Slirp is the example that comes to mind. In fact I think the > > QEMU developers are the de facto maintainers of the Slirp codebase. > > > >> So I think we should either just use GTK, or make Qemu ready for > >> integration of C++ GUI code (and use one of the common GUI toolkits), or > > > > It seems pretty clear that C++ is a non-starter. > > I don't think so. I think the real goal here should be to decide: what > are the required features for a Qemu GUI that meets a broad range of > needs, and what would be the fastest and most maintainable way to code > them? Surely the integration with the Qemu backend would still be > decoupled enough that you could compile Qemu without the GUI using only > C if you wanted to? > > David > > > _______________________________________________ > Qemu-devel mailing list > Qemu-devel@nongnu.org > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel