From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GHn73-0008O1-Ni
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 15:49:37 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GHn71-0008NH-Vq
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 15:49:36 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GHn71-0008NE-R1
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 15:49:35 -0400
Received: from [199.45.160.85] (helo=harmony.bsdimp.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1GHnG2-0000e0-HH
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 15:58:54 -0400
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:47:00 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <20060828.134700.-1699738378.imp@bsdimp.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] ENOMEDIUM OS X patch
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060828193421.14111.qmail@web30911.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <5e7b45b4cf51fac28f28fe90147e19e8@soe.ucsc.edu>
	<20060828193421.14111.qmail@web30911.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: elowe8@yahoo.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

In message: <20060828193421.14111.qmail@web30911.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
            Eric Lowe <elowe8@yahoo.com> writes:
: Yes you are correct Solaris does not define this
: either, and I doubt other *nix systems do.
: 
: Can this just be changed to
: 
: #ifndef ENOMEDIUM
: #define ENOMEDIUM blahblah
: #endif
: 
: or somesuch?

None of the BSDs define it either.  At least not FreeBSD nor OpenBSD.
It isn't suprising then that OS X doesn't define it.  It wasn't in BSD
4.4-lite.

Warner