From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GHlIt-0001X1-KP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:53:43 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GHlIs-0001Uw-J5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:53:43 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GHlIs-0001Uo-FD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:53:42 -0400 Received: from [65.74.133.4] (helo=mail.codesourcery.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1GHlRs-0005E2-5c for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 14:03:00 -0400 From: Paul Brook Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Asking about testing a character device on Qemu ARM system Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 18:53:35 +0100 References: <20060828141225.27003.qmail@web38112.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20060828141225.27003.qmail@web38112.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200608281853.37515.paul@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Monday 28 August 2006 15:12, Tieu Ma Dau wrote: > Hi all, > I use Qemu to simulate ARM system. I add a simple LED device at IO port > address 0x1b000000 (because this address is marked "reserved" in > IntegratorCP documentation). > So I want to ask you the following questions: > 1. Is there any problem if I use address 0x1b000000 for my new device? > 2. How can I test this device? Treat it exactly like you would real hardware. Paul