From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GNUSO-00063m-Lt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 09:07:12 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GNUSN-00063S-5b for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 09:07:11 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GNUSN-00063J-0k for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 09:07:11 -0400 Received: from [65.74.133.4] (helo=mail.codesourcery.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1GNUU5-0007RG-KX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 09:08:57 -0400 From: Paul Brook Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Whats the status of SH4 port? Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 14:06:57 +0100 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200609131406.58850.paul@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Kristoffer Ericson On Tuesday 12 September 2006 16:05, Kristoffer Ericson wrote: > Greetings, > > Would be interesting to hear on the status of the SH4 port. Im developing > for SH3 and the processors are quite similiar. It mostly works. I've successfully used it to run SH2 applications. I'd expect the same to be true for SH3. Paul