From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GWZlu-0006Ar-RF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 Oct 2006 10:36:54 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GWZlt-00068B-Ch
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 Oct 2006 10:36:54 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GWZlt-000686-5f
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 Oct 2006 10:36:53 -0400
Received: from [128.8.10.163] (helo=po1.wam.umd.edu)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GWZtE-0004oD-Ii
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 Oct 2006 10:44:28 -0400
Received: from jbrown.mylinuxbox.org (jma-box.student.umd.edu [129.2.250.188])
	by po1.wam.umd.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
	k98EalFx007593
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sun, 8 Oct 2006 10:36:47 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 10:36:46 -0400
From: "Jim C. Brown" <jma5@umd.edu>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] International Virtualization Conference
Message-ID: <20061008143646.GA27314@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org>
References: <20061008123019.94942.qmail@web52613.mail.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20061008123019.94942.qmail@web52613.mail.yahoo.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 05:30:19AM -0700, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> http://www.linuxworldexpo.de/linux_messe.php?ID=124&STEP=&lang=en
> 
> I don't see Qemu mentioned at all. I wonder if any of the developers have been contacted at all. I thing it is a pity that once againg Qemu is ignored.
> 
> Ottavio
> 
> 

qemu is primarily a dynamic translator not a virtualizer.

I suppose that qemu could get in by virtue of kqemu. That is closed source but
being closed source hasn't stopped VMware.

> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Qemu-devel mailing list
> Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
> 

-- 
Infinite complexity begets infinite beauty.
Infinite precision begets infinite perfection.