From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
To: Blue Swirl <blueswir1@hotmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-system-sparc question?
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 15:11:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200610141511.57566.paul@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BAY104-F24607558F45198104EAFD2FF0B0@phx.gbl>
On Saturday 14 October 2006 09:14, Blue Swirl wrote:
> >There's no such think as an Ideal cpu. It's like picking the right
> >religion :-) If you want a toy cpu, there are things like mmix.
>
> In general true. But the real and toy CPUs are designed with the hardware
> construction in mind, whereas the limitations deriving from HW (number of
> registers, number of instructions, instruction complexity) may be less
> relevant in the Qemu case. Also Qemu could benefit from getting information
> analysed from the source code that no real HW needs. For example, perhaps
> the TB state could be managed explicitly by the compiler.
There are plenty of pre-existing dynamic compilation targets, pretty much all
of which have JIT compilers. eg. JVM, CIL and parrot. IMHO qemu probably
isn't a particularly good base for this sort of thing, as it's more oriented
towards emulating conventional CPUs.
Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-14 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-10 16:40 [Qemu-devel] qemu-system-sparc question? Ishwar Rattan
2006-10-10 17:55 ` K. Richard Pixley
2006-10-10 18:59 ` WaxDragon
2006-10-10 19:10 ` Ishwar Rattan
2006-10-10 20:34 ` Blue Swirl
2006-10-10 20:44 ` Ishwar Rattan
2006-10-10 22:00 ` Marco Matthies
2006-10-11 2:39 ` Paul Brook
2006-10-11 12:05 ` Ishwar Rattan
2006-10-11 17:20 ` Blue Swirl
2006-10-11 17:32 ` K. Richard Pixley
2006-10-11 17:32 ` Marco Matthies
2006-10-11 18:04 ` Brian Wheeler
2006-10-11 19:28 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-10-11 19:38 ` Blue Swirl
2006-10-11 20:02 ` K. Richard Pixley
2006-10-13 22:31 ` Paul Brook
2006-10-14 8:14 ` Blue Swirl
2006-10-14 14:11 ` Paul Brook [this message]
2006-10-10 23:51 ` Aurelien Jarno
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-10-11 21:03 Ben Taylor
2006-10-11 22:38 ` Johannes Schindelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200610141511.57566.paul@codesourcery.com \
--to=paul@codesourcery.com \
--cc=blueswir1@hotmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).